~begin Grund comment:
I’ve done it again… I have included politics in my blog. When will I learn?
The below post (below the ------ line) was done a week or so ago, Karl left a comment (thanks Karl) and got me looking more deeply into who started the pretrib thing. Click this line to see Karl’s comment.
Karl brought to light (and the other articles I’ve now read about Lacunza, Edward Irving and the Irvanites, Darby, and a few others) that pretrib origin is cloudy and I was thinking what to post and then realized what I was doing, including politics.
Only this time it was called religion, arguing about ‘endless genealogies’.
1 Timothy 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
Does it *really* matter who started it all? So I will end this post with this.
Question: When is the last trump? Ans. Right before Christ’s return.
People use 1 Thes 4:16-17 to show pretrib.
1 Thessalonians 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Paul also wrote the below, describing the same event:
1 Corinthians 15:52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
The trump of God and the last trump are the same, Christ returns at the end of the tribulation.
Here are a few scriptures showing we will be here for the tribulation:
POST TRIB SCRIPTURES - N.T. - MATTHEW 13: 24-30, 13:36-53, 24:13, 24:29-31, 24:37-41 - MARK 13:13, 13:24-27 - LUKE 17:26-30, 17:34-37 - JOHN 6:39, 40, 44, 54 11:24, 12:48, 16:33, 17:15 - ACTS 2:19-20, 14:22, - HEBREWS 9:28 - EPHESIANS 6:13 - 1 THESSALONIANS 4:15-17, 5:2-4 - 2 THESSALONIANS 1:6-10, 2-1-9 ROMANS 5:3 - 12:12 - 1 CORINTHIANS - 5:5, 15:51-57 - 2 CORTHINIANS 1:4 - REVELATION 1:7, 2:10, 2:26, 6:9-11, CH. 7:9-14, 10:7, 11:6-12, 12:12, 15:1,6-8, 16:1, 19: 11-21, 20:4-6
O.T. - PSALM 37:9-11, 52:3-6 - PROVERBS 2:21-22, 3:25-26, 10:30 - ISAIAH 13:9-13, 26:21, EZEKIEL 13:20- JOB 14:12-15 - MALACHI 4:1-3
Thanks to www.posttribnetwork.com for the above.
Stay in the faith, trust in the Lord!
~end Grund comment
---------------------------------------------------------------
Just to clear the air, I believe we will go through the tribulation.
I heard a video called Rapture Madness with Guest Phil Elmore at www.profoundprophecy.com
Here is a excerpt about Margaret McDonald and the origins of the pretrib illusion (Starts at time mark 1:34:10) from the Rapture Madness with Guest Phil Elmore video.
2 comments:
A most interesting blog. The late Dr. John Walvoord, viewed as the No. 1 pretrib rapture expert, touches on the partial rapture position in his books - the view that Margaret MacDonald held to. Walvoord, in his "Rapture Question: Revised," p. 97, refers to partial rapturists as "pretribulationists" - pretribs who see just PART of the church raptured before the tribulation and the rest of the church left behind to endure the Antichrist. Walvoord quotes leading partial rapturists including Govett, Lang, and Panton. In their detailed discussions such writers always refer to those left on earth, after a pretrib rapture, as the "church"- the part of the "church" that will be tried by Antichrist. And we today often refer to all living believers on earth collectively as the "church" even though it is only PART of the church, the rest of the church being the dead in Christ who are now with the Lord. The terminology used by MacDonald is exactly how partial rapturists talk. The earliest pretribs were all partial rapturists and they often stated that those raptured first are the "church" of Philadelphia and what is seen as the "church" left behind is Laodicea." MacDonald's views were soon plagiarized, with no credit given her, in Rev. Edward Irving's journal, several writers for it having interviewed her several weeks earlier. For more info Google "X-Raying Margaret" and "Edward Irving is Unnerving." Several misguided defenders of the pretrib view have deliberately censored or twisted the quiet research done in Britain in recent years; her views were well known for decades and then swept under the rug for more than a century until recently unearthed. As a professor I have personally checked out these details and am convinced that she was the originator, that the Irvingites obtained it from her, and that several years later Darby began quietly "borrowing" from the Irvingites and in his early works referred to pretrib as the "new wine," adding that "the thoughts are new." Well read Darby would have laughed if anyone had tried to tell him that pretrib had been taught before 1830, by the way. I would urge all to investigate this and read the Google items listed above.
Sincerely, Karl Meyer-Haus
I noticed in Miss MacDonald's revelation of 1830 that she referred to the rapture by writing "the one taken and the other left" [about halfway through]. Three lines later she says the "WICKED" [Antichrist] is "revealed." So her rapture is before the revealed of Antichrist - and Hal Lindsey talks the same way in his books and of course when he says the rapture happens before Antichrist's revealing he is expressing the gist or kernel of the pretrib view. Readers can Google "Scholars Weigh My Research" to see reactions to the research in Britain by historian Dave MacPherson, the one who discovered rare copies in both the US and England of Dr. Robert Norton's reproductions of her revelation. What isn't known yet by many is the fact that she later married Norton - so Norton got not only her novel thoughts "straight from the horse's mouth," so to speak, but also her explanation of what she meant. Writers for Irving's journal also visited her (and so did Darby) and soon reflected her view in their journal WITHOUT GIVING HER ANY CREDIT! But it was a man's world in the 1830's and women were generally viewed as ignorant or uneducated, but was anyone justified in plagiarizing her?! Have done some checking into all this and am convinced that she expressed the kernel of pretrib before anyone else. Rachel
Post a Comment
I hate having to fill out a form just to post a comment, but I have had to add that thing where you have to type in the letters that you see in the graphic to be able to post a comment, because I was getting nasty spam stuff. You can still choose anonymous.
If you have relevant links or resources, please put them in the comments and I will certainly check them out!