Hi all, just a quick post. The “Is Preterism True?” article has had its audio fixed…, sorry for the delay. Grund.
http://grundzusammen.blogspot.com/2011/05/is-preterism-true.html
The internet is the world's largest research library..., for good or evil. Following are somethings about me, Truth, answering falsehoods as best I can, some humorous things I like, .....we'll see how it goes.
Hi all, just a quick post. The “Is Preterism True?” article has had its audio fixed…, sorry for the delay. Grund.
http://grundzusammen.blogspot.com/2011/05/is-preterism-true.html
Where is the wise man?
Where is the scholar?
Where is the philosopher of this age?
Has not God made foolish
the wisdom of the world?
For since in the wisdom of God
the world through its wisdom
did not know him,
God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached
to save those who believe.
Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom,
but we preach Christ crucified:
a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles,
but to those whom God has called,
both Jews and Greeks,
Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.
For the foolishness of God is wiser than man’s wisdom,
and the weakness of God is stronger than man’s strength.
Dr. Don Patton shows how much of the history in the Bible is corroborated by archaeological finds.
Grund comment: Very interesting article….
Righteousness, Judgment and Grace:
When a person asks, sometimes restraining anger, "Who is to say if (a certain behavior) is right or wrong - or if "right" and "wrong" even exists?"
I sometimes wonder if they mean, "Who are you to say that my view or behavior is wrong?" No one likes to be confronted with that possibility.
Often this scenario arises when the subject relates to 'hot buttons' - abortion and the nature of marriage. Even more offensive in the context of post-modernity’s general reluctance to make moral distinctions, rooted in its broader rejection of philosophical or moral absolutes, is the concept of consequence.
Yet the thought of human trafficking, child labour, or the realization that prototypes of Hitler's death camps were developed by Kaiser Wilhelm II in Africa prior to World War I1 cause sane humans to shudder and rankle. Why?
The world cannot actually live with the moral schizophrenia of a rejection of personal moral absolutes in the 'micro' and the demand for justice from governments, corporations and history in the 'macro.'
Grund comment: I was thinking here in recent history about the ‘Occupy Movement’ which is really just anarchy. They want what they consider ‘right’ yet do not themselves do what is ‘right’.
The fact is good and evil, right and wrong, remain powerfully evident in the world, both in the 'micro' and the 'macro.' -
The question then is rather ‘what is the line between good and evil, right and wrong, and who defines it?’
That line, I would suggest, exists, is defined by God's righteousness, and expressed as God’s law,
Read it from the beginning at: http://www.murraymoerman.com/blog/2010.asp
During his lifetime King witnessed the birth of Israel and the continuing struggle to build a nation. He consistently reiterated his stand on the Israeli-Arab conflict, stating
"Israel's right to exist as a state in security is uncontestable."
It was no accident that King emphasized "security" in his statements on the Middle East.
On March 25, 1968, less than two weeks before his tragic death, he spoke out with clarity and directness stating,
"peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality."
MLK on Peace, Israeli Security and Anti-Zionism
Was wondering what the Doctrine of Imminence was, found this page.
IS THE DOCTRINE OF IMMINENCE TAUGHT IN THE BIBLE?
by Sheila Sternberg
The generally accepted definition of imminence is that Jesus could come "at any moment" meaning there are NO signs to occur, NO prophecies to be fulfilled before Jesus returns for the rapture of the church. However...
Christ predicted the destruction of the Temple (Luke 21:6, Matt. 24:2, Mark 13:2.) He also predicted the coming of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8.) Could He return before these things were fulfilled?
Go here for the rest>> link
“It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning cannot be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction cannot lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.”
“It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong.”
-Voltaire
Read more> JPost |
Why we as Christians are children of the promise.
Very good video.
If your interested in the audio only version you can get it here:
| This article done by Sheila Lewis Busby at www.lookup.org (go there, good stuff) The words "church" and "churches" are absent from Rev. 4 - 22. Therefore, the church is absent from the earth during that time, right? Well, are you aware that these same words are also absent from 2 Tim., Titus, Heb., 1 & 2 Peter, 1 & 2 John, and Jude? Is the church absent then too? Hmmm? Titus and 2 John don't even mention Christians, brother(s), brethern, or saint(s) (although they both mention the word "elect"). Does that mean those books don't even pertain to us? (Sounds silly doesn't it?) Is it possible that the church is mentioned between Rev. 4 and 22? "I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star." Revelation 22:16 Jesus said that the book of the Revelation is for the church. Why would He say that when we are gone, and the "tribulation saints" aren't even a part of the church? I would be very cautious about basing any theology on what the scripture does not say. My final question is this, are you willing to stake the safety of your family during a time of "great tribulation" on this kind of theology? Think about it. |
“A vacation in this world, is a chance to fool yourself into thinking that you’re not stuck (in a rut), just waiting for the right time to start your new life.” ~ PajamasMedia>Belmont Club>The Ten Thousand
There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.
-- John Adams Letter to Jonathan Jackson (2 October 1789)